- PTI protest meant to stop economic progress of country: Sanaullah.
- Dispels rumours linking Bushra’s release to “deal” with govt.
- PM’s aide questions PTI’s ability to gather protesters.
Reacting to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s announcement of commencing a new countrywide protest movement, Adviser to Prime Minister on Political and Public Affairs Rana Sanaullah said on Thursday that the government was ready to counter any “unusual” protest plan via “unusual measures”.
The former ruling party has announced launching a nationwide protest movement against the 26th Constitutional Amendment which it strongly opposed in both houses of the parliament during its passage earlier this month.
The announcement was made by the Imran Khan-founded party’s Secretary General Salman Akram Raja in Lahore earlier today, terming the 26th Amendment “attack on the Constitution of Pakistan and the judiciary”.
He said that his party would strongly resist the constitutional tweaks and added that a plan had been chalked out to organise sit-in and demonstration across the country.
Speaking on Geo News programme “Aaj Shahzeb Khanzada Kay Sath”, the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) senior leader said that PTI’s protest call was meant to stop the economic progress and create uncertainty in the country.
Pointing towards the “low attendance” in the PTI’s previous power shows and protests, Sanaullah was of the view that the former ruling party could not gather a large number of protesters which could be troublesome for the government to handle.
He, however, said that in case of any “unusual plan”, the federal government would take “unusual measures” to handle the situation.
To a question, Sanaullah dispelled speculations of any deal with PTI with the coalition government, which allegedly led to the release of PTI founder Imran Khan’s wife Bushra Bibi from jail.
He categorically rebuffed the deal rumours, saying that striking a deal was not possible with the court.
Commenting on the former first lady’s release, the politician-cum-lawyer opined that the court always takes a lenient decision if a case is not concluded in six to eight months.
He was also questioned about the chances of the 26th Constitutional Amendment’s revocation via a Supreme Court’s bench formed under Practice and Procedure law.
Sanaullah ruled out the possibility of constitutional packaged being struck down by court, saying parliament has decided to “assert” its authority “and no one would try to violate Article 239 of the Constitution”.
